Short Answer:
It's reasonable to assume that over millions of years, a large portion of the gold that fell into the oceans ultimately ended up on or beneath the seafloor (rather than staying suspended in the water column). However, the exact distribution in seabed sediments varies, and significant hydrothermal and geological processes play a role-not just passive "sinking." As for comparing ocean-water gold concentrations to average near-surface soil, the commonly cited average crustal abundance of gold is around 1-4 parts per billion (ppb), which is higher than 1 gram per 100 million tonnes would suggest. So if you're positing only 1 gram per 100 million tonnes in soil, that's a far lower concentration than mainstream geological estimates.
Over 70% of Earth's surface is covered by oceans. Meteorite impacts that brought gold to Earth were effectively random, so a significant portion undoubtedly landed in regions now submerged. Some estimates suggest there could be multiple times more gold beneath the seafloor than in all known terrestrial deposits. However, whether it's four times as much-or significantly more or less-remains an open question due to the vastness of ocean basins and limited direct sampling.
Large portions of meteorite-derived gold likely impacted areas now covered by water, eventually finding its way into or under the seabed. While gold truly is widespread (though in tiny concentrations), comparing oceanic concentrations to soil must be done carefully. Mainstream geological estimates generally place the average crustal abundance in the 1-4 ppb range, which is still quite low-but notably higher than the ultra-trace levels implied by 1 gram per 100 million tonnes.
Provenance: This explanation is part of ChatGPT research. Produced and refined by ChatGPT based on user input and general geochemical references. For more information, visit OpenAI.